ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Automated detection of quiet eye durations in archery using electrooculography and comparative deep learning models.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiological mechanisms and adaptation in high-performance shooting: a biomarker review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a deep learning-based approach for the automated detection of Quiet Eye (QE) durations from electrooculography (EOG) signals in archery. QE-the final fixation or tracking of the gaze before executing a motor action-is a critical factor in precision sports. Traditional detection methods, which rely on expert evaluations, are inherently subjective, time-consuming, and inconsistent. To overcome these limitations, EOG data were collected from 10 licensed archers during controlled shooting sessions and preprocessed using a wavelet transform and a Butterworth bandpass filter for noise reduction. We implemented and compared a traditional model (SVM) and five deep learning models-CNN + LSTM, CNN + GRU, Transformer, UNet, and 1D CNN-for QE detection. The CNN + LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (95%), followed closely by CNN + GRU (93%), demonstrating superior performance in capturing both spatial and temporal dependencies in the EOG signals. Although Transformer-based and UNet models performed competitively, they exhibited lower precision in distinguishing QE periods. The performance of the traditional model was inferior to deep learning approaches. These results indicate that deep learning provides an effective and scalable solution for objective QE analysis, substantially reducing the dependence on expert annotations. This automated approach can enhance sports training by offering real-time, data-driven feedback to athletes and coaches. Furthermore, the methodology holds promise for broader applications in cognitive and motor skill assessments across various domains. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, enabling real-time deployment, and evaluating model generalizability across different skill levels and sports disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.