SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
The effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pain, function, and quadriceps muscle strength in adults with patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of blood flow restriction exercise interventions on patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of electrical stimulation combined with strength training on pain, muscle strength and lower-limb biomechanics in patellofemoral pain patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder, with Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) often used as a complementary treatment option, however no definitive evidence supports its benefits. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding NMES to exercise programs for treating PFP.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, ClinicalTrails.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched up to July 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of NMES in people with PFP. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts; another pair filtered full-text articles. The studies had to report pain, functionality, and strength as outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0). Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
resultsEleven RCTs, involving 571 participants, were included. Most of the studies were of high risk of bias. NMES combined with exercise was favored in the long course for improving function (SMD: 3.74, 95% CI 1.35, 5.81; P = 0.0004) and quadriceps muscle strength (SMD: 0.53, 95% CI 0.18, 0.89; P = 0.003) compared to exercise; however, it did not differ from exercise in relieving pain and improving EMG activity level, and participation. The GRADE certainty rating of the results was rated as very low mostly due to inconsistency and high risk of bias.
conclusionVery low certainty of evidence suggests that adding NMES to an exercise program may improve the knee joint function and quadriceps strength with treatment courses of six weeks or more in patients with PFP, but it is not superior to control for reliving pain and improving EMG activity, activity level, and participation. Larger, high-quality RCTs on the long-term are needed to reach an incisive conclusion. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at Open Science Framework Register under https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y2JUZ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.