Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783520›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Two sides of the story: bridging organizational and individual resilience - a qualitative study.

Hilda Bø Lyng, Colleen Cheek, Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hilda Bø LyngSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. hilda.b.lyng@uis.no.
Colleen CheekAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Cecilie Haraldseid-DriftlandSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resilience literature, champions are recognized as key organizational resources. Yet, their willingness to take on these roles and contribute extra efforts is rooted in autonomous motivation. This study aims to contribute understanding of both sides of this resilience story through the exploring of the motivation of champions found to contribute to organizational resilience in healthcare.

methodsThe empirical setting for this study includes eight different sites (two hospitals, five nursing homes and one home healthcare service) entailing interviews and observations of 55 healthcare informants (leaders and workers). Analysis of collected qualitative interviews through a deductive -inductive thematic analysis, using Self-determination Theory as an a priori framework for the deductive analysis.

resultsThe importance of fostering connection among team members as well as between team members and leaders, offering flexibility to the champion to manage their role, and brokering relationships among teams or departments were illuminated.

conclusionsThrough the exploration of champions' autonomous motivation for acting as organizational champions to ensure resilient performance in healthcare organizations, this study provides a more holistic picture where both sides of the story can be understood. Such holistic knowledge of champions is key to understand how to identify, support and maintain champions in their role to lay the groundwork for resilient performance in healthcare.

Indexed as

LeadershipResilience, PsychologicalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMotivationNursing HomesOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchAdaptationAutonomyChampionsCompetenceIndividual resilienceOrganisational resilienceRelatedness

Identifiers

PMID40783520
PMCPMC12335771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.