ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Development and validation of the NOVA score for surgical triage in metastatic spinal cord compression.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective diagnostic model development and validation study.
objectivesTo develop and validate the NOVA (Nottingham Oncologic Vertebral Algorithm) Score, a pragmatic, surgeon-oriented tool for predicting 12-month survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), and to compare its performance to established prognostic scores and oncologist estimates.
methodsTwo independent cohorts of patients with MSCC referred for surgical consideration were included from a tertiary spine center: a derivation cohort (n = 184) and a validation cohort (n = 100). Feature selection was performed using random forest analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and permutation-based variable importance. The final NOVA Score incorporated three clinical parameters: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), primary tumor category, and presence of extraspinal metastases. The score ranges from 0 to 10, with a threshold of ≥ 7 used to predict > 12-month survival. Predictive performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Cohen's kappa, and calibration plots.
resultsIn the validation cohort, the NOVA Score achieved an accuracy of 71.0%, AUC of 0.693, F1-score of 47.3% for > 12-month survival, and Cohen's kappa of 0.28. Calibration plots showed good agreement in the mid-to-high probability range. Compared to the Revised Tokuhashi Score, OSRI, Modified Bauer Score, and oncologist estimates, NOVA demonstrated superior sensitivity for identifying long-term survivors using only three readily available variables.
conclusionsThe NOVA Score is a simple, reproducible tool for early prognostication in MSCC. Its minimal input requirements and balanced performance support its utility for surgical triage in multidisciplinary settings. Further external validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40783471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.