Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783441›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A blockchain-based deep learning approach for student course recommendation and secure digital certification.

Amjad Rakha, Ahmad Alzubi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amjad RakhaInstitute of Social Sciences, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, Mersin, Turkey.
Ahmad AlzubiInstitute of Social Sciences, University of Mediterranean Karpasia, Mersin, Turkey. ahmad.alzaubi@akun.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the student course recommendation process with secure certificate issuance has remained a critical research area due to the rise of e-learning and personalized learning. The recommendation system enhances the recommended educational resources to improve the students' learning process. The previous conventional research works shared hybrid content and collaborative filtering techniques, which boosted academic performance, personalized learning, and secure certification for students. However, the existing techniques faced several difficulties in handling the syllabus updates based on evolving recommendations, complexity, and security issues related to certificate issuance. To address the challenges in the existing techniques, the research introduces the Deep Certifier-DX509 model for secure certificate issuance and student course recommendation. The proposed approach exploits the Modified Attention-Enabled Deep Long Short-Term Memory (MA-DLSTM) Model as a recommendation system to suggest the most suitable courses based on users' prior academic performance, and integrates X509 as the Certificate generation algorithm. Specifically, the incorporation of the X509 Blockchain with Proof-of-Work (PoW) in the certificate sub-system serves as a major contribution to enhance the security with Two-step authentication and generates accurate course recommendations. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed Deep Certifier-DX509 model shows superior performance, achieving a high Genuine User Rate (GUR) of 0.73, Memory Usage of 453.81KB, Transaction time of 1.03 s, Responsiveness of 2.39s and Throughput of 119.52bps, outperforming the other existing techniques.

Indexed as

Blockchain-based authenticated certificate systemDeep Certifier-DX509Intelligent educational systemStudents course recommendation

Identifiers

PMID40783441
PMCPMC12335520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.