ArticleScientific reports2025
Unveiling social determinants of health impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes through natural language processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models for Social Determinants of Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond the 'Pregnancy Black Box': a global roadmap for artificial intelligence-driven pharmacogenomics in maternal-neonatal health.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Review
- Unveiling social determinants of health impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes through natural language processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the role of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) in pregnancy outcomes is critical for improving maternal and infant health yet extracting SDoH from unstructured electronic health records remains challenging. We trained and evaluated natural language processing (NLP) models for SDoH extraction from clinical notes in the MIMIC-III database (86 notes), and externally evaluated them on the MIMIC-IV database (171 notes) to assess generalizability. Focusing on social support, occupation, and substance use, we compared rule-based, word embedding, and contextual language models. The ClinicalBERT model with decision tree classifier achieved the highest performance for social support (F1: 0.92), while keyword processing excelled for occupation (F1: 0.74), and word embeddings with random forest performed best for substance use (F1: 0.83). Logistic regression revealed significant associations between pregnancy complications and both substance use (OR 6.47, p < 0.001) and social support (OR 0.07, p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates the feasibility of NLP for SDoH extraction and underscores their clinical relevance in maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.