Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing AI-driven forecasting of diabetes burden: a comparative analysis of deep learning and statistical models.

Rasool Esmaeilyfard, Mohsen Bayati

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rasool EsmaeilyfardDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohsen BayatiHealth Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. bayatim@sums.ac.ir.

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 31032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of diabetes burden is essential for healthcare planning, resource allocation, and policy-making. While deep learning models have demonstrated superior predictive capabilities, their real-world applicability is constrained by computational complexity and data quality challenges. This study evaluates the trade-offs between predictive accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency in diabetes forecasting. Four forecasting models were selected based on their ability to capture temporal dependencies and handle missing healthcare data: Transformer with Variational Autoencoder (VAE), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA). Annual data on Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), Deaths, and Prevalence from 1990 to 2021 were used to train (1990-2014) and evaluate (2015-2021) the models. Performance was measured using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Robustness tests introduced noise and missing data, while computational efficiency was assessed in terms of training time, inference speed, and memory usage. Statistical significance was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests. The Transformer-VAE model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (MAE: 0.425, RMSE: 0.501) and demonstrated superior resilience to noisy and incomplete data ([Formula: see text]). LSTM effectively captured short-term patterns but struggled with long-term dependencies, while GRU, though computationally efficient, exhibited higher error rates. ARIMA, despite being resource-efficient, showed limited capability in modeling long-term trends, indicating potential benefits in hybrid approaches. While Transformer-VAE provides the most accurate diabetes burden forecasting, its high computational cost and interpretability challenges limit its scalability in resource-constrained settings. These findings highlight the potential of deep learning models for healthcare forecasting, while underscoring the need for further validation before integration into real-world public health decision-making.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes MellitusModels, StatisticalCost of IllnessDisability-Adjusted Life YearsForecastingHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiabetes mellitusDisability-adjusted life yearsForecastingGlobal burden of diseasePublic health forecasting applicationsRobustness to noisy and incomplete data

Identifiers

PMID40783432
PMCPMC12335553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.