ArticleScientific reports2025
Combining bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) and Charlson comorbidity index improves early risk stratification in biliary acute pancreatitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical-radiological comparative evaluation of the BISAP and Computed tomography severity index scores as predictors of severity in acute pancreatitis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Are BISAP and APACHE II scores still useful to identify high-risk patients in acute pancreatitis? A retrospective multicenter analysis on 450 patients.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of all cause and cause specific acute pancreatitis: target trial emulation.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Risk stratification in acute pancreatitis (AP) remains a clinical challenge. Because AP populations are diverse, focusing on one etiology might reveal interesting insights concerning predictors of outcomes. In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, all patients with biliary AP admitted between 2018 and 2021 were included. Predictors of clinical outcomes - including severity, ICU-admission, complications, and 90-day mortality - were assessed. In total, 217 biliary AP patients, mean age 65.9 years (SD 17.4), 49.3% female, were included, with a median length of stay 7 days (IQR 4;11). BISAP scores were 0 in 30.0%, 1-2 in 63.5%, and 3-5 in 6.4% of patients. Higher BISAP and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were significantly associated with worse outcomes, including ICU admission, persistent organ dysfunction, and mortality (p < 0.001). When combined, BISAP and CCI identified five risk groups with progressively increasing rates of complications and mortality. Notably, 41.1% of patients fell into the lowest risk group, with only 2 ICU admissions, and with an uncomplicated course in 97.6% of cases, supporting potential early discharge. Mortality in the very-high risk group (BISAP 3-5, CCI ≥ 6) was 50%. The combination (BISAP-C) enhances early prognostication in biliary AP and may guide individualized management and healthcare resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.