ArticleScientific reports2025
Natural language processing reveals network structure of pain communication in social media using discrete mathematical analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain-centered symptom-language co-occurrence networks differ between interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and fibromyalgia in Reddit patient discourse.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating vaginal laser therapy into multidisciplinary management of bladder pain syndrome and vulvodynia.BMC urology · 2026Review
- Discrete mathematical network analysis bridging clinical vocabulary and patient discourse in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome online communications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain-related discussions on social media provide valuable insights into how people naturally express and communicate their pain experiences. However, the network structure of these discussions remains poorly understood. This study analyzed 57,000 Reddit comments from the GoEmotions dataset (2005-2019) using natural language processing and network analysis techniques grounded in discrete mathematical principles. The constructed network, comprising 5,630 nodes and 86,972 edges, revealed complex patterns of pain-related language use. The network exhibited a sparse overall density (0.0055) but a high clustering coefficient (0.7700), indicating the presence of distinct thematic communities. At the center of the network was the term pain, which showed the highest degree centrality (0.821429), reflecting its semantic anchoring function in pain discourse. Other terms, such as headache, served as context-sensitive bridge nodes that connected different semantic subdomains. In contrast, terms like burning, despite moderate centrality values, were found to co-occur predominantly with metaphorical or decorative expressions rather than emotion- or symptom-related descriptors. Community detection revealed 12 distinct clusters, with the largest containing 1,021 nodes, capturing diverse aspects of pain communication. Stability analysis demonstrated that core pain-related terms maintained consistent centrality, while peripheral or metaphorical terms showed greater variability. These findings offer novel insights into the semantic structure of pain discourse and suggest that network analysis of social media discussions can inform improved clinical communication and symptom assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.