ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of propylene fibers and industrial wastewater on the properties of self-compacting concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different transverse reinforcement confinements on circular columns cast with recycled concrete aggregates and treated wastewater.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating the effects of employing recycled carpet fibers and micro-silica on the mechanical properties of concrete under elevated temperatures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the global water shortage crisis and the prevalent use of drinking water in concrete production, exploring practical solutions, such as reusing various wastewater, is essential. This study investigates the properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC) incorporating treated industrial wastewater sourced from dye factories. Propylene fibers at lengths of 6 mm and 12 mm were employed at volumes of 0.1% and 0.2%, with a water-to-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.5. Additionally, a 0.1% fiber concentration was tested in SCC with a w/c of 0.36, involving a 20% reduction in coarse aggregate in both scenarios except for control samples. While the use of treated industrial wastewater did not affect workability, propylene fibers reduced workability. When comparing samples using drinking water, the addition of 0.1% enhanced compressive strength by 10%, whereas a 0.2% propylene fiber concentration resulted in a 30% decrease in compressive strength. The inclusion of 1% propylene fibers with a length of 6 mm, combined with treated industrial wastewater, led to a reduction in compressive strength for low-cement mixes with a w/c of 0.5. Conversely, in high-cement mixes with a w/c of 0.36 using treated wastewater and 0.1% propylene fiber, the compressive strength increased compared to the control sample using treated industrial wastewater. Incorporating 2% silica fume as a cement replacement for both mixing designs resulted in a significant improvement in compressive strength at 90 days. Ultrasonic test results exhibited a strong correlation with compressive strength, highlighting the effectiveness of this method in evaluating mechanical properties. The volumetric water absorption increased with fiber incorporation, peaking at 66% higher than the control when using 0.2% fibers. However, the volumetric water absorption of the new sample mixture with 6 mm propylene fibers, 440 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.