ArticleScientific reports2025
Oral cancer detection via Vanilla CNN optimized by improved artificial protozoa optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyperspectral imaging in oral oncology: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Development of Leading Enhancement Assistive Planning: A three-dimensional malocclusion classification system for orthodontic treatment with clear aligners.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we propose a new method for oral cancer detection using a modified Vanilla Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture with incorporated batch normalization, dropout regularization, and a customized design structure for the convolutional block. An Improved Artificial Protozoa Optimizer (IAPO) metaheuristic algorithm is proposed to optimize the Vanilla CNN and the IAPO improves the original Artificial Protozoa Optimizer through a new search strategy and adaptive parameter tuning mechanism. Due to its effectiveness in search space exploration while avoiding local optimal points, the IAPO algorithm is chosen to optimize the convolutional neural network. In this study, a dataset of 1000 images of patients had published which will be preprocessed with contrast enhancement, noise reduction and data augmentation (like rotation, flipping and cropping) to generate the robust targeted model for oral cancer detection. The experimental results are evaluated against benchmark performance measures (accuracies, precision, recall, F1-score and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC-ROC). We demonstrate through experimental results that the proposed IAPO optimized Vanilla CNN achieves a high accuracy of 92.5% which is superior than the previous state-of-the art models such as ResNet-101 (90.1%) and DenseNet-121 (89.5%). This proves to be a more trustworthy approach to oral cancer detectionbecause of the accuracy of the proposed method in comparison to denoting the supplementary results of the suggested method in contrast to other existing models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.