ArticleScientific reports2025
An unexpected tumor-resistant phenotype from floxing PAK1 in a mouse model of colitis associated cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colitis-associated cancer are associated with activation of PAK1 (p-21 activated kinase 1). We previously found that total knockout of PAK1 (PAK1KO) reduced tumorigenesis upon AOM/DSS but enhanced tumorigenesis in another model of IBD with total knockout of IL10 (IL10KO). To better understand the specific role of epithelial PAK1, we crossed Pak1 floxed (PAK1fl) with VillinCre mice for a conditional knockout of PAK1 in intestinal epithelia (PAK1CKO). PAK1fl were included as additional controls. Unexpectedly, inflammation and tumorigenesis were greatly reduced in PAK1fl compared to WT or PAK1KO after AOM/DSS treatment. PAK1CKO had higher tumor incidence and counts compared to PAK1fl, but was still lower in comparison to PAK1KO or WT. When crossed with IL10KO mice, PAK1CKO exacerbated the expected hyperproliferative phenotype, resulting in early mouse morbidity. Despite normal Pak1 mRNA expression in PAK1fl colonic lysates, PAK1 protein expression on immunohistochemistry was higher that WT. Both PAK1fl and PAK1CKO mice were more resistant to shifts in microbiome, and remained clustered together compared to WT or PAK1KO. Altogether, our results suggest that floxing itself may have altered Pak1 expression, which conferred protection from AOM/DSS carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.