ArticleScientific reports2025
Maximizing multi-source data integration and minimizing the parameters for greenhouse tomato crop water requirement prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate scientific predicting of water requirements for protected agriculture crops is essential for informed irrigation management. The Penman-Monteith model, endorsed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), is currently the predominant approach for estimating crop water needs. However, the complexity of its numerous parameters and the potential for empirical parameter inaccuracies pose significant challenges to precise water requirement predictions. In this study, we introduce a novel water demand prediction model for greenhouse tomato crops that leverages multi-source data fusion. We employed the ExG (Excess Green) algorithm and the maximum inter-class variance method to develop an algorithm for extracting canopy coverage from image segmentation. Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was utilized to select the combination of canopy coverage and environmental data, followed by the random forest feature importance ranking method to identify the most optimal feature variables. We constructed average fusion, weighted fusion, and stacking fusion models based on RandomForest, LightGBM, and CatBoost machine learning algorithms to accurately predict the water requirements of greenhouse tomato crops. The results show that the stacking model has the best prediction effect, and the error is lower than that of RandomForest, LightGBM, CatBoost, Average fusion model and Weighted fusion model. The feature combination of Tmax, Ts, and CC, filtered using Spearman and RandomForest, demonstrated the lowest prediction errors, with reductions in MSE, MAE, and RMSE of over 4%, 14%, and 3%, respectively, compared to other parameter combinations. The R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.