ArticleScientific data2025
US-CoastEX: Observation-based probabilistic reanalysis of storm surge and sea level extremes for the United States.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- US-CoastEX: Observation-based probabilistic reanalysis of storm surge and sea level extremes for the United States.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable estimates of storm surge and sea level extremes with proper uncertainty quantification are key for cost-effective risk/adaptation planning. However, observational estimates are often unavailable or uncertain along most coastlines owing to data scarcity. Here, we provide a fully observational-driven probabilistic dataset (US-CoastEX) of storm surge and sea level extremes for the U.S. coast (1950-2020). Non-stationary extreme storm surge distributions are generated for gauged and ungauged sites by applying Bayesian methods to the U.S. tide gauge network, complemented with additional storm data unavailable in commonly used tide gauge data. The distributions are combined with tidal peak data to estimate return periods and levels of extreme sea levels and their uncertainty. Ou results show that traditional site-by-site estimates based on existing model data, as well as regionally-aggregated analysis of standard tide gauge data, have underestimated 100-year extreme sea levels by 50% (on average) along much of the U.S. coast, especially in regions exposed to extreme storms. The data supports coastal managers to make decisions, especially in vulnerable areas where in-situ sea-level monitoring is limited.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.