ArticlePreventive medicine2025
Food insufficiency and difficulty affording expenses after the end of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program emergency allotments in the United States among households with and without children.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hunger Tradeoffs and Coping Strategies Among Families with Food Insecurity in Massachusetts.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEmergency allotments were issued in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the largest program addressing food insecurity in the United States, during the COVID-19 pandemic. These emergency allotments temporarily increased the amount of monthly food purchasing assistance received by SNAP-participating households. Our aim was to examine the association of the end of SNAP emergency allotments with food insufficiency and difficulty affording expenses, overall and among households with and without children.
methodsWe used March 2021-April 2022 Household Pulse Survey data from respondents in four states that ended emergency allotments in August 2021 ("earlier ender" states) and eight states that ended emergency allotments after the end of the study period (comparison states). We conducted difference-in-differences analyses to compare changes in the risk of food insufficiency and difficulty affording expenses from before to after the end of emergency allotments in August 2021 between SNAP-participating households in "earlier ender" states and comparison states.
resultsEarlier ending of SNAP emergency allotments was associated with a 5.0 percentage point increase in the risk of food insufficiency (risk difference (RD) = 0.05, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.07) and an 8.0 percentage point increase in the risk of difficulty affording expenses (RD = 0.08, 95 % CI 0.06, 0.09). The increase in the risk of food insufficiency was slightly larger for households with children (RD = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.03, 0.09) than households without children (RD = 0.04, 95 % CI 0.00, 0.08).
conclusionsSNAP benefit reductions after the end of emergency allotments were associated with difficulty affording food and household expenses among households with and without children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.