Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783114›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025

A Novel Droplet Digital PCR Assay for BRCA1 and RAD51C Methylation: Advancing Homologous Recombination Deficiency Detection in Ovarian Cancer.

Cassandra Michel, Alizée Simon, Andréa Witz, Idrissia Hanriot, Julie Dardare, Margaux Betz, Maxime Brun, Pauline Gilson, Jean Louis Merlin, Alexandre Harlé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cassandra MichelService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. Electronic address: c.michel@nancy.unicancer.fr.
Alizée SimonDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Andréa WitzService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Idrissia HanriotDépartement de Biopathologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Julie DardareService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Margaux BetzService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Maxime BrunDépartement de Biopathologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Pauline GilsonService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Jean Louis MerlinService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Alexandre HarléService de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7039 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) affects 50% of ovarian cancers and influences poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor efficacy. Although one-third of HRD tumors harbor a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, these mutations are not the sole cause of HRD. Promoter methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C contributes to 19% and 2% of cases, respectively. A cohort of 224 patients with ovarian cancer tested for HRD validated the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technique. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, and the Genomic Instability Index (GII) was assessed using the SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution. BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter methylation was analyzed by ddPCR following enzymatic conversion, with a 10% threshold for methylation classification. Homologous recombination status was assessed in 194 patients. A positive GII (>0) was identified in 77 cases (39.7%), with 24 (31.2%) harboring a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, and 2 (2.6%) a RAD51C mutation. Methylation analysis revealed BRCA1 promoter methylation in 32 patients (41.6%) and RAD51C promoter methylation in 1 patient (1.3%), clarifying HRD status in 28 additional cases (36.3%). The study confirms HRD extends beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, with promoter methylation playing a significant role in HRD detection. ddPCR effectively identified methylation-driven HRD, explaining deficiency in 36.4% additional patients with a positive GII score. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating methylation analysis into HRD testing to improve patient stratification for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationHomologous RecombinationOvarian NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsRAD51C protein, human

Identifiers

PMID40783114
PMCPMC12597585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.