ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025
Greater Appeal and Greater Harm? Young Adults' Preference for Menthol Versus Nonmenthol Very-Low-Nicotine Cigarettes in a Cross-Over Trial.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed rulemaking to reduce cigarette nicotine content and ban menthol in cigarettes. Menthol is popular among young adults who smoke, although it is unclear how this group would respond if both policies were implemented.
methodsA total of 112 young adults who smoke menthol cigarettes completed 3 visits that varied by cigarette smoked (2021-2024): usual brand menthol, menthol very-low-nicotine cigarette (0.3 mg nicotine/g tobacco), and nonmenthol very-low-nicotine cigarette. Very-low-nicotine cigarette flavor order was counterbalanced. Subjective response and smoking topography were assessed at each session as well as pre-post smoking measurements of expired carbon monoxide, cigarette weight, cardiovascular effects, nicotine withdrawal, and craving. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to examine differences in the outcomes across cigarette type.
resultsTotal smoking duration, interpuff interval, and puff count were higher for usual brand than for both very-low-nicotine cigarette smoking. Interpuff interval was higher in menthol very-low-nicotine cigarette smoking than nonmenthol. Usual brand was more appealing than both very-low-nicotine cigarettes and led to greater increases in carbon monoxide and cardiovascular effects and decreased postsmoking cigarette weight and craving compared with both very-low-nicotine cigarettes. Menthol very-low-nicotine cigarettes produced more positive subjective responses, higher carbon monoxide, and lower postsmoking cigarette weight and craving than nonmenthol.
conclusionsParticipants preferred menthol over nonmenthol very-low-nicotine cigarettes, although very-low-nicotine cigarettes were less appealing than usual brand, overall. Despite similar topography across very-low-nicotine cigarette flavors, toxicant exposure and craving were greater and lower, respectively, after menthol than after nonmenthol very-low-nicotine cigarette smoking. Findings support the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's proposals to ban menthol cigarettes and institute market-wide reductions in cigarette nicotine content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.