Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782953›Full record

ArticleBrain research2025

Context controls the ability of unconditional stimulus deflation to mitigate fear relapse.

Payton K Robinson, Sydney Trask

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Payton K RobinsonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, United States.
Sydney TraskDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, United States. Electronic address: strask@iu.edu.

Funding

Behavioral, circuit, and molecular mechanisms underlying UCS deflationR01MH136311 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Sydney Trask · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH136311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our lab, and others, have recently demonstrated that fear behavior can be weakened following fear acquisition with a footshock unconditional stimulus by presenting a weaker version of that footshock, a phenomenon termed 'unconditional stimulus deflation' or US deflation. Unlike extinction, US deflation putatively functions by modifying the original fear memory, potentially making it a more effective candidate for reducing fear and preventing relapse effects often observed following extinction. Here, we adapted our contextual fear US deflation procedure to a delay conditioning paradigm in order to examine common relapse phenomena: renewal and reinstatement. We found that while ABA renewal and reinstatement were unaffected by US deflation, AAB renewal was reduced by US deflation. Our results support similar work in suggesting that prevention of relapse is at least partially dependent on deflation occurring in the same context as training when using a delay fear conditioning procedure.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFearAnimalsElectroshockMaleRatsDeflationExtinctionFearLearning memoryReinstatementRenewal

Identifiers

PMID40782953
PMCPMC13358201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.