ArticleSurgery2025
Early peripheral vascular intervention for treating patients with claudication: A decision analysis using national administrative claims data.
Article in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClaudication, a symptom commonly associated with peripheral artery disease, affects approximately 30-40% of adults in the United States. A decision analysis is needed to integrate data, information, and knowledge from multiple sources about the stages of a patient's journey in this condition to assess the optimal treatment approach.
methodsWe designed a decision model including patient perspective and outcomes of claudication, peripheral vascular intervention, open surgical bypass, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and amputation. Time horizon was 2 years and tradeoffs were expressed as "cost-effectiveness," with "cost" taken as number of procedures, and "effectiveness," the amount of time in claudication and/or recovery. The treatment alternatives were peripheral vascular intervention within 6 months of initial diagnosis of claudication (early peripheral vascular intervention) or peripheral vascular intervention >6 months after claudication diagnosis (to allow for guideline-directed conservative therapy first). Probabilities were derived from 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data between January 2017 and December 2021. A Markov model was designed and populated for the 2 scenarios. The main outcomes included the estimated number of peripheral vascular interventions, estimated number of open bypass procedures, and total time in claudication. Using Monte Carlo Simulation, 1,000,000 patients were run through the model for the 2-year time horizon. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching was conducted to control for baseline differences between groups, matching patients on age, sex, race, and comorbidities.
resultsA cohort comprising 445,305 patients newly diagnosed with claudication was identified, exhibiting a mean age of 76.2 years. Among these patients, 12,102 (2.7%) underwent early peripheral vascular intervention, whereas 433,203 (97.3%) had no early peripheral vascular intervention. The simulation demonstrated that patients who underwent an early peripheral vascular intervention experienced an estimated average of 3.6 peripheral vascular interventions over the 2 years, whereas those who did not undergo early peripheral vascular intervention averaged 0.3 PVIs over 2 years. Moreover, patients who underwent early peripheral vascular intervention were projected to undergo an average of 1.7 open bypass procedures subsequent to the initial diagnosis of claudication, whereas those who did not receive early peripheral vascular intervention were expected to undergo 0.8 open bypass procedures. The duration of time spent in a state of claudication was observed to be 190 days for patients who underwent early peripheral vascular intervention, in contrast to 360 days for those who did not receive early peripheral vascular intervention. After controlling for baseline characteristics such as age, sex, race, and comorbidities, the results remained consistent in the propensity score matched groups.
conclusionOur novel methodology used claims data to arrive at day-to-day transitions to assess the impact of early peripheral vascular intervention in the management of claudication among patients. Our findings reinforce professional guidelines that early peripheral vascular intervention may not confer beneficial outcomes to patients, potentially leading to adverse effects and necessitating further interventions. This study underscores the significance of health care informatics in harnessing data, technology, and analytical methodologies to enhance decision-making processes, optimize resource allocation, improve the quality-of-care delivery, and promote evidence-based practices within the health care domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.