ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Helping behaviors and cognitive function in later life: The impact of dynamic role transitions and dose changes.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prosocial helping behaviors attenuate accelerated cognitive decline driven by APOE ε4.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Unconditional Quantile Regression Analysis of Volunteering and Cognitive Functioning: Implications for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Motivations, willingness, and gains: a qualitative study of experiences of helping behaviors among community-dwelling older adults in China using self-construal theory.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the burgeoning literature linking prosocial helping behaviors and cognitive function, empirical evidence on whether transitions into and out of helping roles-and how dynamic changes in time commitment-shape cognitive outcomes remain limited. Moreover, most research has focused on formal volunteering, leaving the cognitive outcomes associated with informal helping-assistance provided directly to non-household individuals-largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate the linkages between two forms of helping behaviors-formal volunteering and informal helping-and late-life cognitive function, focusing on dynamic changes in these behaviors over time. Drawing on the life course perspective and two decades of longitudinal data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (1998-2020; N = 31,303), we employed the asymmetric fixed-effects modeling approach within a multilevel framework to assess how intra-individual changes in helper role status and time commitment shape cognitive function trajectories. Results indicated that transitioning into volunteering and informal helping were both associated with a higher level of cognitive function and a slower cognitive decline, and highlighted how sustained engagement in helping can yield cumulative cognitive benefits that progressively become greater over time. The findings also provide unique evidence on the level of time commitment in helping behaviors needed to achieve cognitive benefits, where moderate levels of helping (approximately 2-4 weekly hours) were consistently linked to robust cognitive benefits for both forms of helping. These findings highlight prosocial helping behaviors as impactful, modifiable lifestyle interventions for promoting cognitive health in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.