ArticleOral oncology2025
Osteoradionecrosis as a complication following post-operative intensity-modulated radiation therapy or proton therapy for oral cavity cancer.
Article in Oral oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoradionecrosis After Modern Radiotherapy for Oral Cavity Cancer: Incidence and Risk Factors.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Essential oral health competencies for cancer care: standardizing dental education for modern practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Late toxicities of head and neck radiotherapy.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo report the prevalenceof osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in oral cavity (OC) cancer patients following intensity-modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PRT).
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on consecutive cohort of OC cancer patients treated with IMRT or PRT for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patient information and treatment related variables were collected from medical records. Patients who developed ORN were uniformly graded using CTCAE v5. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare risk factors between IMRT and PRT.Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence (CI) of ORN.
resultsA total of 479 OC SCC patients (426 treated with IMRT and 53 treated with PRT) were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 35 months (IQR, 17-68 months). The prevalence of ORN was similar between groups: 11% (47/426) in the IMRT group (21 Grade 1, 13 Grade 2, 13 Grade 3) and 11.3% (6/53) in the PRT group (2 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3). The median time to ORN development was shorter following IMRT [13 months (IQR, 9-39)] compared to PRT [28 months (IQR, 4-42)].The 3-year CI of any grade ORN was 9.6 % and 11.4 % for IMRT and PRT (log-rank P-value = 0.550), respectively. On univariable analysis, smoking history (P = 0.072), tumor stage (P = 0.011), tumor with mandibular invasion (P = 0.007), and extent of mandibular intervention (P < 0.001) was associated with ORN development. On multivariable analysis, the extent of mandibular intervention remained a significant risk factor (P < 0.001).
conclusionIn this single-institution study, we found a similar prevalence of ORN following IMRT (11%) and PRT (11.3 %) in OC cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.