Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782523›Full record

ArticleInfant behavior & development2025

Composite scores for the NIH Baby Toolbox®.

Y Catherine Han, Elizabeth M Dworak, Maxwell Mansolf, Richard C Gershon, Aaron J Kaat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant behavior & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NIH Baby Toolbox® methodology and norms development.Infant behavior & development · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y Catherine HanDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: ych@northwestern.edu.
Elizabeth M DworakDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Maxwell MansolfDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Richard C GershonDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Aaron J KaatDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

TASK ORDER 5: MAKE READY THE NIH BABY TOOLBOX FOR END USERS: FINALIZE ALL PARTICIPANT-LEVEL DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSES, AND DISSEMINATION75N94019D00005 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2024
$12.7M
NICHD NIH HHS 75N94019D00005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NIH Baby Toolbox® offers assessments spanning Cognition, Motor, and Social-Emotional Functioning domains and includes both measure-level and composite scores. Here, we describe the creation of eight composite scores, reflecting Language, Executive Function/Memory, Math, Cognition, Motor, Self-Regulation, Negative Affect, and Social Communication - key constructs in infant and toddler development. Using composite scores rather than measure-specific scores can offer a more holistic evaluation of functioning by combining measures, reducing the impact of outliers and measurement error. Using factor analysis, data from the original Baby Toolbox norming study (N = 2515 recruited; n = 2479 with at least one composite score; n = 2025 English, n = 454 Spanish) were analyzed to derive composite scores. Analyses were conducted on regression-weighted factor scores for individual measures to define composites. Psychometric properties were assessed using composite reliability, test-retest reliability, and external validation with the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (3rd edition), Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition), and the child's age. Composite scores demonstrated excellent composite reliability, moderate to strong test-retest reliability, minimal practice effects for most scores, moderate and significant relations with most external measures, and moderate to strong correlations with age for abilities expected to improve with age. The Baby Toolbox composite scores offer a reliable, valid tool for assessing key areas of infant and toddler development. The evidence supporting their reliability and validity demonstrates their effectiveness as indicators of early cognitive, motor, and social-emotional growth, making them useful in clinical, research, and educational settings. This framework helps deepen our understanding and practical evaluation of developmental milestones during the early years.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInfantMaleNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Reproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesAssessmentComposite scoresNIH Baby Toolbox

Identifiers

PMID40782523
PMCPMC12424376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.