Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782308›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025

Chronotype and Mental Health: Are Late Sleepers More Vulnerable?

Renske Lok, Jamie M Zeitzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Renske LokDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. rlok@stanford.edu.
Jamie M ZeitzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Application of precision medicine to phototherapy: a stepped care approach to consolidate sleep and slow cognitive decline in older adultsK99AG084846 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LOK, RENSKE · 2024 to 2025
$262k
NIA NIH HHS K99AG08484NIA NIH HHS K99 AG084846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines emerging evidence on the relationship between behavioral sleep timing and psychiatric disorders, highlighting the critical distinction between circadian preference (chronotype) and actual timing of sleep. These two concepts are not identical and show independent and interdependent impacts on a variety of mental health outcomes. Evidence suggests that actual sleep timing, rather than chronotype preference, is a stronger predictor of mental health outcomes, with late-night sleep patterns more consistently linked to poorer mental health across both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The mechanisms linking late night sleep patterns to poorer mental health are not well understood and cannot be fully explained by reduced sleep duration or being awake during the biological nighttime. Modifiable social and environmental factors likely play a role. Future research should clarify causal mechanisms and inform culturally sensitive, chronobiologically-informed interventions.

Indexed as

ChronotypeCircadian RhythmMental DisordersMental HealthSleepHumansSleep DurationChronotypeNeurocognitive vulnerabilityPsychiatric conditionsSleep-wake timing

Identifiers

PMID40782308
PMCPMC12433348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.