ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Feline botulism: two decades and two reports.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes an outbreak of type C botulism in domestic cats in central region of Brazil, two decades after the only previously reported natural case in the specie. Between August and October 2024, 21 cats presented with flaccid tetraparesis and were clinically evaluated. The course of the clinical signs varied from acute to subacute, with signs including hypotonia of all limbs, bladder and intestines, hypophonia, and flaccid paralysis of masticatory muscles. Eight cats died due to cardiorespiratory arrest. Necropsy and histopathological analyses revealed no significant macroscopic or microscopic lesions. Botulinum toxin type C was detected in five cats through standard mouse bioassay: in feces (n = 3), liver (n = 1), and intestinal contents (n = 1). Although the toxin was not found in the remaining animals, botulism was not excluded based on clinical and epidemiological findings, absence of spinal or other neurological lesions, and the exclusion of other infectious agents. All cats tested negative for FeLV, Coronavirus, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum, and were also screened for intestinal parasites. Despite the strong epidemiological evidence, including common exposure to commercial diets, hunting behavior, and outdoor access, the source of intoxication was not identified. This study highlights a rare and severe outbreak of feline botulism and reinforces the importance of considering this diagnosis in similar clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40782285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.