ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
From cell cycle control to cancer therapy: exploring the role of CDK1 and CDK2 in tumorigenesis.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- ANKRD9 negatively regulates chicken myogenesis through ubiquitin-mediated regulation of IMPDH2.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Conserved Pathways, Divergent Outcomes: A Cross-Species Genomic Perspective on the Cancer-Neurodegeneration Paradox.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An integrated study combining network toxicology machine learning and molecular simulation reveals the molecular mechanisms of permanent hair dyes in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular insights into the anticancer properties of dieckol: a comprehensive review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Targeting dysregulated epigenetic and transcription factor networks inBlood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Tceal7 is a BRG1-regulated target of calcineurin signaling that promotes myoblast differentiation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics-driven identification of CDK1 as a central oncogenic driver in TNBC: anFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Simultaneous targeting of KRAS and CDK4 synergistically induces durable growth arrest in pancreatic cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) family comprises one of the most common types of serine/threonine kinases responsible for controlling many cellular processes through the action of the dynamics of these enzymes. The CDKs are regulators of cellular processes, ranging from cell cycle progression, an integral step of cellular lifespan involved in its division and growth, to the expression of genes and the transfer of genetic information from DNA to RNA. CDK-related pathology is primarily based on the dysregulation of CDK, resulting in improper coordination of the cell cycle and leading to uncontrolled proliferation. The CDK1 involved in the G2 to M-phase transition interacts with CENPF, PVT1, and TFCP2L1, which affects chromosome segregation and cell proliferation. Besides the previously described partners, namely PRDX2 and C/EBPα, the CDK2 responsible for the G1/S transition has also been shown to bind TBK1 and modulate DNA synthesis and cell cycle checkpoints. Such mechanisms of action contribute to oncogenesis through interactions, including roles for lncRNAs and miRNAs in modulating the expression and activity of CDKs. Their importance in cancer has made CDK1/2 critical candidates for anticancer drug targeting. The dysregulation of CDK1/2 manifests in cancer pathology, which is, in turn, associated with an uncoordinated normal cell cycle and resultant proliferation. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse functions of CDK1 and CDK2 in cancer, thereby facilitating the exploration of their therapeutic potential and the development of novel cancer therapy designs. The complexity of targeting CDK1 and CDK2 highlights the importance of their regulation during cancer development. It indicates their substantial promise as valid targets for therapy, in vitro and vivo studies, and human sample analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40782258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.