Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782258›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

From cell cycle control to cancer therapy: exploring the role of CDK1 and CDK2 in tumorigenesis.

Jitendra Gupta, Bahaa Ibrahim Saeed, Ashok Kumar Bishoyi, Ali G Alkhathami, Shodiyev Asliddin, Deepak Nathiya, M Ravi Kumar, Deepak Bhanot, Amera Bekhatroh Rashed, Yasser Fakri Mustafa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jitendra GuptaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, UP, 281406, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8453-0142
Bahaa Ibrahim SaeedMedical Laboratory Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Technology, University of Al-Maarif, Anbar, Iraq. bahaaibrahimsaeed@gmail.com.
Ashok Kumar BishoyiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Marwadi University Research Center, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360003, India.
Ali G AlkhathamiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Shodiyev AsliddinDepartment of Agronomy, Navoi State University of Mining and Technologies, Navoiy, Uzbekistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7776-1950
Deepak NathiyaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
M Ravi KumarDepartment of Basic Science and Humanities, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, India.
Deepak BhanotCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7895-8133
Amera Bekhatroh RashedNursing Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-6947
Yasser Fakri MustafaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Mosul, Mosul, 41001, Iraq.

Funding

King Khalid University RGP.02/534/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) family comprises one of the most common types of serine/threonine kinases responsible for controlling many cellular processes through the action of the dynamics of these enzymes. The CDKs are regulators of cellular processes, ranging from cell cycle progression, an integral step of cellular lifespan involved in its division and growth, to the expression of genes and the transfer of genetic information from DNA to RNA. CDK-related pathology is primarily based on the dysregulation of CDK, resulting in improper coordination of the cell cycle and leading to uncontrolled proliferation. The CDK1 involved in the G2 to M-phase transition interacts with CENPF, PVT1, and TFCP2L1, which affects chromosome segregation and cell proliferation. Besides the previously described partners, namely PRDX2 and C/EBPα, the CDK2 responsible for the G1/S transition has also been shown to bind TBK1 and modulate DNA synthesis and cell cycle checkpoints. Such mechanisms of action contribute to oncogenesis through interactions, including roles for lncRNAs and miRNAs in modulating the expression and activity of CDKs. Their importance in cancer has made CDK1/2 critical candidates for anticancer drug targeting. The dysregulation of CDK1/2 manifests in cancer pathology, which is, in turn, associated with an uncoordinated normal cell cycle and resultant proliferation. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse functions of CDK1 and CDK2 in cancer, thereby facilitating the exploration of their therapeutic potential and the development of novel cancer therapy designs. The complexity of targeting CDK1 and CDK2 highlights the importance of their regulation during cancer development. It indicates their substantial promise as valid targets for therapy, in vitro and vivo studies, and human sample analysis.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle CheckpointsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2NeoplasmsAnimalsCell CycleHumansCDC2 Protein KinaseCDK1 protein, humanCDK2 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2CancerCDK1CDK2Cell Cycle RegulationCyclin-Dependent KinasesOncogenesisProliferation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.