Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782212›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Patients refusing a permanent colostomy for rectal cancer: clinical outcome and psychological aspects.

Nitzan Goldberg, Mika Appelbaum, Yaron Rudnicki, Hagai Soback, Assaf Rahmani, Shmuel Avital

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nitzan GoldbergDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. Goldberg.nitzan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9925-1779
Mika AppelbaumDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Yaron RudnickiDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Hagai SobackDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Assaf RahmaniDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Shmuel AvitalDepartment of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor locally advanced rectal tumors affecting the lower rectum, anal sphincter, or levator muscles, abdominoperineal resection (APR) is one of the surgical options. This involves extensive tissue removal and the creation of a permanent colostomy. However, colostomy is perceived by certain patients as a serious challenge, affecting multiple aspects of their lives. Thus, some refuse surgery and accept the risks of leaving the tumor untreated. Our study aims to explore refusal rates and reasons for declining surgery.

methodsPatients who were recommended to undergo APR surgery as part of their rectal cancer treatment were evaluated. These patients were followed up and underwent interviews and completed three questionnaires: one to explore reasons for surgery refusal, another to assess depression (PHQ-9), and a third to evaluate coping strategies (COPE). A medical psychologist analyzed the questionnaire responses.

resultsDuring the study period 96 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer. Eighty-four patients had anterior resection, one patient had TAMIS, and 11 patients were recommended to undergo APR. Out of them, five completed the surgery, and six refused. They were the focus of our study. All patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Average follow up time was 27 months. Two patients died during the study. Primary reasons for rejecting colostomy included concerns about social stigma and feelings of shame, as well as struggles with depression and anxiety. Notably, one patient was diagnosed with moderate depression based on the PHQ-9 questionnaire.

conclusionA planed permanent colostomy presents a significant psychological and emotional hurdle for patients. The fear of the procedure is so intense that some patients choose to avoid it while risking their lives. It is imperative to implement various measures to aid patients in the peri-operative setting, such as establishing support groups and providing mentors who have experienced the same disease and treatment.

Indexed as

ColostomyRectal NeoplasmsTreatment RefusalAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProctectomySurveys and QuestionnairesAbdominal-perineal resectionColostomyRectal cancerStoma

Identifiers

PMID40782212
PMCPMC12335384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.