Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782198›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Spinal-QDCNN: advanced feature extraction for brain tumor detection using MRI images.

Loganayagi T, Jeneetha Jebanazer J, Vaddadi Vasudha Rani, Madan Lal Saini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Loganayagi TDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Paavai Engineering College, Pachal, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India. loganayagithiyagarajanpec@paavai.edu.in.
Jeneetha Jebanazer JDepartment of ECE, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vaddadi Vasudha RaniDepartment of Information Technology, GMR Institute of Technology, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Madan Lal SainiAIT-CSE , Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor occurs due to the abnormal development of cells in the brain. It has adversely affected human health, and early diagnosis is required to improve the survival rate of the patient. Hence, various brain tumor detection models have been developed to detect brain tumors. However, the existing methods often suffer from limited accuracy and inefficient learning architecture. The traditional approaches cannot effectively detect the small and subtle changes in the brain cells. To overcome these limitations, a SpinalNet-Quantum Dilated Convolutional Neural Network (Spinal-QDCNN) model is proposed for detecting brain tumors using MRI images. The Spinal-QDCNN method is developed by the combination of QDCNN and SpinalNet for brain tumor detection using MRI. At first, the input brain image is pre-processed using RoI extraction. Then, image enhancement is done by using the thresholding transformation, which is followed by segmentation using Projective Adversarial Networks (PAN). Then, different processes, like random erasing, flipping, and resizing, are applied in the image augmentation phase. This is followed by feature extraction, where statistical features such as average contrast, kurtosis and skewness, and mean, Gabor wavelet features, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) with Gradient Binary Pattern (GBP) are extracted, and finally detection is done using Spinal-QDCNN. Moreover, the proposed method attained a maximum accuracy of 86.356%, sensitivity of 87.37%, and specificity of 88.357%.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansBrain tumor detectionMagnetic resonance imagingProjective adversarial networkSpinalNetStatistical features

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.