ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Predicting anterior repositioning splint efficacy in disc displacement with reduction using MRI-based texture and quantitative analysis: a retrospective study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Efficacy of a digitally designed anatomical repositioning splint for adolescent temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Discrepancy between centric relation and therapeutic position in TMJ disc displacement: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo quantitatively analyze potential factors influencing the efficacy of anterior repositioning splint (ARS) therapy in patients with disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), and to explore the prognostic value of MRI-based texture analysis. MATERIALS AND
methods82 patients with 140 joints of DDWR were conducted in the retrospective study from 2020 to 2022. The custom maxillary ARS was fabricated based on incisal edge-to-edge occlusal record. Patients were instructed to wear the ARS full-time and adjusted monthly for at least 6 months. MRI evaluation of 140 joints was conducted at four check-up time: pre-treatment (T0), the initiation of ARS insertion (T1), treatment completion (T2), and follow-up (T3). TMJ disc morphology and position were quantified based on MRI images, and post-ARS therapy outcomes were stratified into three categories: excellent, improved, or poor. In sequence, texture analysis (TA) of the retrodiscal tissue (RDT) was conducted based on MRI images. Five texture parameters were extracted and calculated using a gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Statistical analysis including chi-square test, independent samples T test or Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted.
resultsAmong 82 DDWR patients (140 joints), 84 joints (60%) achieved excellent outcomes, characterized by high initial disc recapture (98.8%) and new bone formation (15.5%), after ARS treatment, while 47 joints (34%) showed improvement and 9 joints (6%) had poor results. Quantitative analysis revealed that mandibular protrusive distance was significantly greater in the excellent group (3.50 ± 1.70 mm) than in the improved group (2.80 ± 1.20 mm; P = 0.032). Longitudinal MRI images revealed significant reductions in disc displacement distance (mean Δ = 3.11 mm, P < 0.01) and disc-condyle angle (mean Δ = 45.96°, P < 0.01) after ARS treatment, although minor recurrence occurred during follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the TA parameter of Angular Second Moment(ASM) exhibited a strong positive association with clinical outcomes in both the excellent (adjusted OR = 9.545, 95% CI: 1.785-51.056, P < 0.05) and improved (adjusted OR = 8.272, 95% CI: 1.568-43.636, P < 0.05) groups compared to the poor group. Each unit increase in ASM was associated with approximately 9.5-fold and 8.3-fold higher odds of achieving excellent or improved outcomes, respectively.
conclusionARS treatment could be used to correct disc-condyle relationship and reduce disc displacement distance in patients with DDWR. Multiple factors influence ARS outcomes. The high disc recapture rate following ARS insertion was correlated with excellent therapeutic outcomes, and mandibular protrusive distance may influence the successful disc recapture. Texture analysis might be identified ASM as a potential predictive imaging biomarker. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ARS is a conservative and efficient treatment for the patients with DDWR.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300078816).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40782193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.