ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Automated 3D segmentation of rotator cuff muscle and fat from longitudinal CT for shoulder arthroplasty evaluation.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning model for automated 3D segmentation of rotator cuff muscles on longitudinal CT scans to quantify muscle volume and fat fraction in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
methodsThe proposed segmentation models adopted DeepLabV3 + with ResNet50 as the backbone. The models were trained, validated, and tested on preoperative or minimum 2-year follow-up CT scans from 53 TSA subjects. 3D Dice similarity scores, average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and relative absolute volume difference (RAVD) were used to evaluate the model performance on hold-out test sets. The trained models were applied to a cohort of 172 patients to quantify rotator cuff muscle volumes and fat fractions across preoperative and minimum 2- and 5-year follow-ups.
resultsCompared to the ground truth, the models achieved mean Dice of 0.928 and 0.916, mean ASSD of 0.844 mm and 1.028 mm, mean HD95 of 3.071 mm and 4.173 mm, and mean RAVD of 0.025 and 0.068 on the hold-out test sets for the pre-operative and the minimum 2-year follow-up CT scans, respectively.
conclusionThis study developed accurate and reliable deep learning models for automated 3D segmentation of rotator cuff muscles on clinical CT scans in TSA patients. These models substantially reduce the time required for muscle volume and fat fraction analysis and provide a practical tool for investigating how rotator cuff muscle health relates to surgical outcomes. This has the potential to inform patient selection, rehabilitation planning, and surgical decision-making in TSA and RCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.