ArticleBiogerontology2025
Modeling the geometry of circadian synchronization and period across aging.
Article in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythms in aging and longevity: from molecular chronomics to translational gerontology.Biogerontology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circadian freerunning periods change across the lifespan, yet most computational models do not reproduce these shifts without assuming additional mechanisms. Although the maturation and later deterioration of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) shape behavioral and humoral rhythms, the underlying driver of period change is more general. We show that it arises from an inherent property of a positively skewed frequency distribution, which naturally follows from a symmetric Gaussian distribution of intrinsic periods. Using a Kuramoto framework with a time-dependent coupling strength and age-related widening of period variability, we map the geometry of synchronization and macroscopic period and trace a developmental trajectory across this surface. Strong coupling in early adulthood pulls the synchronized period below the mean, matching data from C57BL/6 mice, whereas declining coupling and greater heterogeneity in late life lengthen the period and reduce amplitude. The same mechanism explains the negative correlation between amplitude and macroscopic period when period variability is high. This "circadian geometry" reveals that age-dependent variations in the macroscopic period are sufficiently explained by coupling and the width of the period distribution, and provides a parsimonious framework applicable to the SCN and other oscillator populations for understanding long-term changes in circadian dynamics during development and aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40782162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.