Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40782035›Full record

ArticleClinical genetics2026

Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing After Perinatal Death.

Camille M Schubert, Matilda R Jackson, Christopher P Barnett, Hamish S Scott, Thomas Sullivan, Stephen Goodall, Tracy Merlin, Genomic Autopsy Study Research Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of medical genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Camille M SchubertSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-1612
Matilda R JacksonDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Christopher P BarnettPaediatric and Reproductive Genetics Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Hamish S ScottDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Thomas SullivanSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephen GoodallCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tracy MerlinSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Genomic Autopsy Study Research NetworkUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Australian Genomics Health Alliance GNT1113531Government of Australia MRFFGHFM76777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly or unexplained perinatal death (PND), clinical geneticists advise on possible genetic causes and likelihood of recurrence, often with limited use of molecular analysis. In the Australian Genomic Autopsy Study (GAS) cases that were unresolved following standard-of-care investigations underwent exome and/or genome sequencing (ES/GS). This diagnostic before-and-after study measured the changes in clinical management, in terms of the effect on clinical counselling that was provided to parents following ES/GS. Clinicians were surveyed before and after receiving sequencing results about the likelihood of recurrence and the reproductive planning advice they would provide to families. 161 pairs of before-and-after surveys were completed. Clinician estimates regarding PND recurrence changed for 45% (73/161) of families after receiving test results, despite a genetic diagnosis being found in only 19%. Families with an 'unknown likelihood' of recurrence reduced from 26% to 15% (p = 0.01). The information provided to parents about recurrence and reproductive planning increased significantly, both with and without a diagnosis, and clinicians reported that most parents expressed value was obtained from the investigation. The utility of genomic autopsy for clinical management is not restricted to families with a genetic finding.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenomicsPerinatal DeathAustraliaAutopsyExome SequencingFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansInfant, NewbornParentsPregnancyWhole Genome Sequencingautopsyclinical geneticsdiagnostic before and after studyfetal anomalygenetic counsellinggenomic autopsygenomic sequencingperinatal deathreproductive planning

Identifiers

PMID40782035
PMCPMC12674983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.