ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Insights From a User Experience-Focused Virtual Study on the Feasibility and Challenges of Decentralized Clinical Trials.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital advances for multicentre studies - the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) experience.BJU international · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Decentralized Clinical Trials: Technology Insights from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Insights From a User Experience-Focused Virtual Study on the Feasibility and Challenges of Decentralized Clinical Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approach may potentially improve patient accrual and diversity and reduce logistical burden; however, its implementation in China is still in its infancy due to limited practical experience and guidance. We utilized stakeholder engagement research to simulate DCT processes and investigate their feasibility and applicability in a local context. This study, conducted between October 2023 and June 2024, engaged stakeholders to simulate the roles of the investigator, study nurse/pharmacist, and patient in a DCT, and explored feasibility, challenges, and procedures locally. Using a mixed-method approach including focus group interviews, heuristic evaluation, usability testing, surveys, and one-on-one interviews, four DCT elements (eConsent, direct-from-patient sample collection, televisits, and direct-to-patient investigational medicine delivery) were simulated at 11 Chinese investigational sites with 36 researchers. Pain points, stakeholder requirements, and key challenges were identified; standardized procedures and a user journey map were developed to provide a visual representation of the DCT process, encouraging broader adoption. The researchers reported high satisfaction across all DCT elements. Key challenges included patients' DCT system process ease of use, lack of thoroughness or attention remotely, integrating online (system) and offline (hospital/home) visits, patient risk management, maintaining medication compliance remotely, and DCT system compatibility, among others. Standard procedures were developed for each DCT element, addressing issues like identity verification and data privacy based on user perspectives. This study provided insights on implementing DCTs in China, identifying areas that need optimization to meet local regulatory and stakeholders' requirements. The standardized framework may be referenced when adapting future DCT elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.