Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781851›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Insights From a User Experience-Focused Virtual Study on the Feasibility and Challenges of Decentralized Clinical Trials.

Yue Ma, Le Li, Gaili Gao, Huan Zhou, Jianmiao Yang, Jiao Zheng, Li Zheng, Lu Zhang, Min Jiang, Pu Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yue MaDevelopment Operations, AstraZeneca Global R&D (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Le LiGlobal User Experience, AstraZeneca Investment (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Gaili GaoClinical Trial Institutions Office, GCP Office, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Huan ZhouClinical Trials Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, AnHui, China.
Jianmiao YangClinical Trial Institutions Office, GCP Office, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiao ZhengClinical Trial Institutions Office, GCP Office, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, Hainan, China.
Li ZhengClinical Trial Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu ZhangClinical Trial Center, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Min JiangBeijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pu LiClinical Trial Institutions Office, GCP Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wenjing ZhouClinical Trial Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xia ChenClinical Trial Center, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9887-2377
Ying WangClinical Trial Institutions Office, GCP Office, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-7025
Weiyi ZhengDevelopment Operations, AstraZeneca Global R&D (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Yan ZhangDevelopment Operations, AstraZeneca Global R&D (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0006-5224-7971

Funding

AstraZeneca Global R&D (China) Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approach may potentially improve patient accrual and diversity and reduce logistical burden; however, its implementation in China is still in its infancy due to limited practical experience and guidance. We utilized stakeholder engagement research to simulate DCT processes and investigate their feasibility and applicability in a local context. This study, conducted between October 2023 and June 2024, engaged stakeholders to simulate the roles of the investigator, study nurse/pharmacist, and patient in a DCT, and explored feasibility, challenges, and procedures locally. Using a mixed-method approach including focus group interviews, heuristic evaluation, usability testing, surveys, and one-on-one interviews, four DCT elements (eConsent, direct-from-patient sample collection, televisits, and direct-to-patient investigational medicine delivery) were simulated at 11 Chinese investigational sites with 36 researchers. Pain points, stakeholder requirements, and key challenges were identified; standardized procedures and a user journey map were developed to provide a visual representation of the DCT process, encouraging broader adoption. The researchers reported high satisfaction across all DCT elements. Key challenges included patients' DCT system process ease of use, lack of thoroughness or attention remotely, integrating online (system) and offline (hospital/home) visits, patient risk management, maintaining medication compliance remotely, and DCT system compatibility, among others. Standard procedures were developed for each DCT element, addressing issues like identity verification and data privacy based on user perspectives. This study provided insights on implementing DCTs in China, identifying areas that need optimization to meet local regulatory and stakeholders' requirements. The standardized framework may be referenced when adapting future DCT elements.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicChinaFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatient SelectionStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID40781851
PMCPMC12334847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.