Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781791›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Converging lens radiotherapy (CLRT) employing kilovoltage x-ray source: Treatment planning study.

Marvin Kinz, Adi Alfassi, Ella Gebert, Dror Alezra, Jürgen Hesser, Piotr Zygmanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marvin KinzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adi AlfassiConvergent Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Ltd., Haifa, Israel.
Ella GebertConvergent Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Ltd., Haifa, Israel.
Dror AlezraConvergent Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Ltd., Haifa, Israel.
Jürgen HesserMannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine (MIISM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Piotr ZygmanskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Convergent Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Ltd., Haifa, Israel
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConverging lens radiotherapy (CLRT) is a novel radiotherapy modality employing a lens which produces a nearly monoenergetic x-ray beam at 60 keV to focus radiation on deep-seated tumors, enabling highly precise dose delivery. PURPOSE: This study represents the first comparison of CLRT treatment plan quality to conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The goal is to provide a proof-of-concept of CLRT treatment planning and to evaluate whether CLRT could potentially offer improved organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing and target coverage.

methodsThe physical CLRT prototype system was developed by Convergent Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Ltd. (CRnR) in Haifa, Israel, under the product name AngelCure. We initially characterized the CLRT beam model using Monte Carlo simulations, validating it with film dosimetry of the physical beam. Subsequently, we developed a 3D dose computation algorithm and novel inverse, non-coplanar treatment planning for CLRT inside the open-source radiation treatment planning platform matRad. Two prototype lenses with different focal spot sizes (A

resultsCLRT demonstrated variable OAR dose sparing. In the CNS case, both lenses showed better hypothalamus sparing, with 0% of the volume receiving 400 cGy or more compared to 91% for Linac. For the Thoracic case, Lens A achieved 0% of esophagus volume receiving more than 1000 cGy, versus 11% for Linac. In the GU case, Lens A delivered at least 400 cGy to 0% of rectum volume, compared to 17% with Linac. CLRT demonstrated potentially better or comparable plan quality metrics, with Lens A showing perfect conformity (CI = 1.00) in the CNS case and Lens B demonstrating the steepest dose gradient (GI = 240%/cm).

conclusionsThis study serves as a first proof-of-concept of the treatment capabilities of a novel CLRT x-ray system. The system demonstrated, in this limited set of plans, better OAR dose sparing compared to conventional Linac-based plans across 3 different anatomical sites, accompanied by similar, and possibly better, plan quality metrics (CI, TCI, CN, GI), while maintaining comparable target coverage.

Indexed as

LensesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansMonte Carlo MethodOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedX-Raysconverging lens radiotherapy (CLRT)non‐coplanar kV x‐ray lens treatment planningorgan at risk (OAR) sparing

Identifiers

PMID40781791
PMCPMC12334860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.