Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781776›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Multi-scale simulations of MUT-16 scaffold protein phase separation and client recognition.

Kumar Gaurav, Virginia Busetto, Diego Javier Páez-Moscoso, Arya Changiarath, Sonya M Hanson, Sebastian Falk, René F Ketting, Lukas S Stelzl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kumar GauravInstitute of Molecular Physiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany; KOMET1, Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Virginia BusettoMax Perutz Lab, Vienna Biocenter Campus (VBC), Vienna, Austria; University of Vienna, Center for Molecular Biology, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, Vienna, Austria.
Diego Javier Páez-MoscosoInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Arya ChangiarathInstitute of Molecular Physiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; KOMET1, Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sonya M HansonFlatiron Institute, Center for Computational Biology & Center for Computational Mathematics, New York City, USA.
Sebastian FalkMax Perutz Lab, Vienna Biocenter Campus (VBC), Vienna, Austria; University of Vienna, Center for Molecular Biology, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, Vienna, Austria.
René F KettingInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Lukas S StelzlInstitute of Molecular Physiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany; KOMET1, Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: lstelzl@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase separation of proteins plays a critical role in cellular organization. How phase-separated protein condensates underpin biological function and how condensates achieve specificity remain elusive. We investigated the phase separation of MUT-16, a scaffold protein in Mutator foci, and its role in recruiting the client protein MUT-8, a key component in RNA silencing in Caenorhabditis elegans. We employed a multi-scale approach that combined coarse-grained (residue-level CALVADOS2 and near-atomistic Martini3) and atomistic simulations. Simulations across different resolutions provide a consistent perspective on how MUT-16 condensates recruit MUT-8, enabling the fine-tuning of chemical details and balancing the computational cost. Both coarse-grained models (CALVADOS2 and Martini3) predicted the relative phase-separation propensities of MUT-16's disordered regions, which we confirmed through in vitro experiments. Simulations also identified key sequence features and residues driving phase separation and revealed differences in residue interaction propensities between CALVADOS2 and Martini3. Furthermore, Martini3 and 350-μs atomistic simulations on Folding@Home of MUT-8's N-terminal prion-like domain with MUT-16 M8BR cluster highlighted the importance of cation-π interactions between Tyr residues of MUT-8 and Arg residues of MUT-16 M8BR. Lys residues were observed to be more prone to interact in Martini3. Atomistic simulations revealed that the guanidinium group of Arg also engages in sp

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegans ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansPhase SeparationProtein BindingCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40781776
PMCPMC12709416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.