ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Multi-scale simulations of MUT-16 scaffold protein phase separation and client recognition.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phase separation of proteins plays a critical role in cellular organization. How phase-separated protein condensates underpin biological function and how condensates achieve specificity remain elusive. We investigated the phase separation of MUT-16, a scaffold protein in Mutator foci, and its role in recruiting the client protein MUT-8, a key component in RNA silencing in Caenorhabditis elegans. We employed a multi-scale approach that combined coarse-grained (residue-level CALVADOS2 and near-atomistic Martini3) and atomistic simulations. Simulations across different resolutions provide a consistent perspective on how MUT-16 condensates recruit MUT-8, enabling the fine-tuning of chemical details and balancing the computational cost. Both coarse-grained models (CALVADOS2 and Martini3) predicted the relative phase-separation propensities of MUT-16's disordered regions, which we confirmed through in vitro experiments. Simulations also identified key sequence features and residues driving phase separation and revealed differences in residue interaction propensities between CALVADOS2 and Martini3. Furthermore, Martini3 and 350-μs atomistic simulations on Folding@Home of MUT-8's N-terminal prion-like domain with MUT-16 M8BR cluster highlighted the importance of cation-π interactions between Tyr residues of MUT-8 and Arg residues of MUT-16 M8BR. Lys residues were observed to be more prone to interact in Martini3. Atomistic simulations revealed that the guanidinium group of Arg also engages in sp
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.