ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
A Standardized, Three-Dimensional Cropping Protocol for Analyzing the Medial Epicondyle of the Humerus.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Standardized, Three-Dimensional Cropping Protocol for Analyzing the Medial Epicondyle of the Humerus.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe medial epicondyle of the humerus has been considered particularly relevant for investigating past activity-related skeletal changes. Yet, the characterization of these skeletal changes on the humerus has been challenging. This study introduces a semi-automated cropping protocol to standardize the analysis of this anatomical region and its entheseal surfaces. MATERIALS AND
methodsA landmark-based cropping protocol was established in 3DSlicer to capture the region of interest, identified based on anatomical literature. Before applying this protocol, mesh resolution and orientation were standardized. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed in 20 humeri through landmark placement precision and cropped model surface area.
resultsThe final cropped surface effectively encompassed the entire entheseal region. Mean landmark distances were mostly below 1 mm for intra-observer comparisons and more variable (between < 1 and 4 mm) for inter-observer comparisons. Distance-based Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (dICC) were all above 0.99. Mean percentage errors between surface areas were predominantly below 5%, with the highest value at 10.39%. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Lin's Correlation Coefficient values all exceeded 0.94. DISCUSSION: The proposed protocol offers a holistic approach to studying entheseal changes at the medial epicondyle while accommodating morphological variation. Despite some subjectivity in landmark placement, the statistical results for both landmark placement and surface area found the method's observer error to be among the lowest in comparable studies. This method provides a valuable tool for examining entheseal surface changes and morphology, with the potential, pending experimental validation, to support research on reconstructing physical activity, pathological conditions, and human evolutionary adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.