ArticleMedical physics2025
Predicting near-complete pathological response to (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: A federated learning study.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agentic AI as a coordination paradigm in digital health and agri-food systems.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Predicting near-complete pathological response to (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: A federated learning study.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrgan preservation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has attracted interest due to improved quality of life and functional outcomes compared with total mesorectal excision. Hence, patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after (chemo)radiotherapy are offered a watch-and-wait strategy. Those who are likely to fall short of the strict criteria of cCR and only achieve near complete response (NCR) might benefit from radiation boosting to avoid surgery. PURPOSE: To develop a prediction model that estimates the probability of NCR trained on data from different clinics.
methodsWe used data from two clinics (Maastro and Gemelli) on 1305 patients. We set up and used a federated learning infrastructure to leverage patient data from the clinics without transferring it. We used Bayesian networks for their capacity to combine expert knowledge with data and their ability to handle missing data. In this article, we propose a novel federated learning algorithm for Bayesian networks. In addition, we explore different approaches to handle missing data and train the models, combining expert elicited structures and those learnt from data. The discriminative performance of the models is reported using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsThe model trained on data from both clinics and a structure learnt from data performed well (AUC 0.77). When using a structure elicited from an expert, the performance of the model decreased (AUC 0.68). Fine-tuning the expert structure with data led to a middle ground performance (AUC 0.72). Models trained on data from a single clinic failed to generalize when tested on data from the other clinic (AUCs 0.50 and 0.59).
conclusionsThe model trained with federated learning showed good discriminative performance, which indicates that it could be useful to identify which patients with rectal cancer would benefit the most from a radiotherapy boost. This study shows that federated learning has the potential to lead to better models by allowing access to more data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.