ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Influence of socio-demographic factors on health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory joint diseases.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Quality of Life, Treatment Adherence, and Health-Seeking Behavior in Turkish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Gender and Education as Key Predictors.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was conducted to describe differences in self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) related to sociodemographic factors.
methodsThe data were collected through an anonymous survey in a cross-sectional study of 261 patients with IJD- rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The patients' health status was assessed using a standard questionnaire [EQ-5D-3L].
resultsThe results showed no significant differences related to the type of JDC in any domain of patients' quality of life. Among the demographic factors, social status showed a significant association with all aspects of patients' HRQoL: mobility ratings (p = 0.002), self-care ratings (p < 0.001), usual activities (p < 0.001), pain or discomfort (p = 0.039), anxiety or depression (p = 0.001). Anxiety and depression were more common among women than men (p = 0.033). Men rated their health higher on the EQ-VAS scale (p = 0.036). Working patients reported better health than retirees (p = 0.008), and disability pensioners (p < 0.001). Better health was associated with higher levels of education (p < 0.001). Patients with elementary education provided the lowest ratings while patients with higher degrees gave the highest ratings. Patients living in villages reported better health than those from urban areas (p = 0.019). Social class, education, and place of residence accounted for 17.9% of the variance in EQ-VAS scores.
conclusionUnderstanding the role of sociodemographic factors is crucial to promote improved patient care and better healthcare resources. The results of our study can serve as a benchmark for future studies to assess the influence of sociodemographic factors among patients with other subtypes of IJD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.