ArticleBMC public health2025
Public awareness and knowledge of aphasia in Malaysia: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of research highlights a persistent gap in public awareness and knowledge regarding aphasia. This lack of understanding presents a significant barrier to improving quality of life for individuals living with aphasia and hinders crucial research investment in the field. Surprisingly, despite the increasing incidence of aphasia in Malaysia, limited published studies have investigated public awareness and knowledge within this population. This study aims to investigate the awareness and knowledge of aphasia among the Malaysian public.
methodsData collection employed a modified online survey distributed to adult residents of Malaysia via a telecommunication application. Two hundred thirteen individuals completed the questionnaire, which assessed demographic characteristics, aphasia awareness levels, knowledge of the condition, and preferred sources of information about aphasia.
resultsOut of 213 participants (female: n = 168, male: n = 45), 77 (36.2%) were aware of aphasia, whereas only 19 (8.9%) had knowledge about it. There was a significant association between occupation and knowledge of aphasia. Gender, age, and educational level had no significant relationship with either awareness or knowledge. The main sources of information were the internet/social media, friends/relatives, and the workplace.
conclusionsThis study revealed a lack of awareness of aphasia among the Malaysian public. Low levels of awareness and knowledge highlight the need for awareness-raising programs throughout the country. Efforts should focus on improving public understanding of aphasia through targeted campaigns and the use of various media platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.