ArticleBMC psychology2025
Investigating phubbing behaviors among university students: a latent profile analysis study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- How do core personality traits influence short video dependence among Chinese college students? Evidence from a serial mediation analysis under the I-PACE model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Phubbing behaviors and psychological well-being: correlates and sociodemographic profiles in university students from Mexico, Colombia, and Peru.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the latent profiles of university students regarding phubbing behavior based on the relationships between self-esteem, social anxiety, perceived true self on the internet, and phubbing behaviors. University students require healthy identity development and fulfilling social relationships. Those who fail to meet these needs may resort to excessive and maladaptive smartphone use. A total of 550 students (67.6% female, 32.4% male), aged between 18 and 27 (Mean = 21.33, SD = 2.97), participated in the study. Data were collected using the General Phubbing Scale, the Interaction Anxiety Scale, the True Me on the Net Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Latent profile analysis, one-way ANOVA, and logistic regression were employed in the analyses. The results revealed three distinct profiles based on phubbing risk: high, moderate, and low risk. According to the logistic regression analysis, self-esteem, social anxiety, perceived true self on the internet, and daily smartphone use were significant variables in determining phubbing risk groups. Individuals in the high-risk group were found to engage more frequently in digital interactions, whereas those in the low-risk group exhibited higher self-esteem and lower social anxiety. In summary, the findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of the psychosocial factors influencing phubbing behavior and offer valuable insights for future research on phubbing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.