ArticleBMC psychology2025
Psychosocial work factors influencing health, safety, well-being and productivity of waste collectors in developing countries: a scoping review.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWaste collectors play a crucial role in waste management in developing countries, yet little effort has been made to improve their psychosocial health, safety, and well-being. Despite growing research on this group, psychosocial work factors are underexplored, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. This review maps evidence on the psychosocial work factors influencing the health, safety, well-being, and productivity of waste collectors in developing countries.
methodsThis review followed the guidelines proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, and reported results and findings using PRISMA-ScR. Detailed search was conducted in four main databases: PubMed Central, Ovid, ScienceDirect, and Taylor and Francis, and other online sources. Thorough screening and data extraction were done based on the inclusion criteria to select relevant articles for the review. Thematic analysis and deductive qualitative synthesis were applied in presenting the findings. Thirty-one (31) articles were included in this review.
resultsThe findings revealed that socio-demographic factors such as low socioeconomic status, low education levels, advancing age, and being resident in a rural community significantly influenced psychosocial work stressors among these waste collectors. High job demands, extended working hours, job dissatisfaction, limited job autonomy, and poor work-home balance were identified as other key psychosocial work factors. Workers also faced low social support, workplace violence, discrimination, and organisational challenges such as delayed salaries, lack of training, and ineffective management. These stressors negatively impact workers' health, contributing to musculoskeletal disorders, infections, vision complications, and high stress levels. Psychosocial work factors further influenced workplace safety, increasing risks of injuries, burnout, and reduced productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and inefficiency.
conclusionThe job demands, job insecurity, limited autonomy, inadequate support, and societal stigma faced by waste collectors collectively undermine their occupational and personal well-being. Supportive workplace policies, targeted training programmes, and accessible health services could help mitigate these challenges, creating safer, more productive work environments for waste collectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.