ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Multi-fidelity graph neural networks for predicting toluene/water partition coefficients.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expanded ensemble predictions of toluene-water partition coefficients in the SAMPL9 logPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of toluene/water partition coefficients of neutral species is crucial in drug discovery and separation processes; however, data-driven modeling of these coefficients remains challenging due to limited available experimental data. To address the limitation of available data, we apply multi-fidelity learning approaches leveraging a quantum chemical dataset (low fidelity) of approximately 9000 entries generated by COSMO-RS and an experimental dataset (high fidelity) of about 250 entries collected from the literature. We explore the transfer learning, feature-augmented learning, and multi-target learning approaches in combination with graph neural networks, validating them on two external datasets: one with molecules similar to training data (EXT-Zamora) and one with more challenging molecules (EXT-SAMPL9). Our results show that multi-target learning significantly improves predictive accuracy, achieving a root-mean-square error of 0.44
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.