Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781667›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Strength of motivation and academic performance of medical students: a longitudinal study.

Sandeep Bansal, Kelly Pagidas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Motivation: Not as easy as it seems.GMS journal for medical education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandeep BansalDepartment of Medical Education Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA. Sandeep.Bansal@tcu.edu.
Kelly PagidasLSU Health School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe strength of motivation for medical school reflects a student’s perseverance in continuing medical training, regardless of personal sacrifices and academic or situational setbacks. Recognizing the patterns of changes in the strength of motivation may be beneficial in pinpointing the time(s) when students struggle to adapt to the rigors of the training, allowing educators to provide appropriate support. We examined the strength of motivation longitudinally and its association with examination performance during the basic science and core clerkship periods.

methodsA prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted at the Burnett School of Medicine from November 2020 through November 2023. First-year medical students were enrolled in the study (n = 51). The Strength of Motivation for Medical School-Revised version (SMMS-R) questionnaire, which consists of three subscales (Willingness to Sacrifice, Readiness to Start, and Persistence), was used at four distinct points during the preclinical and core clinical training. We compared the SMMS-R scores across four measurement points. Average scores from sets of summative assessments corresponding to the SMMS-R data collection time points were used to study correlation with SMMS-R scores.

resultsA repeated-measures ANOVA with Wilks’ lambda determined a significant effect of time on the mean composite SMMS-R scores (p < 0.001), with a medium effect size ([Formula: see text] = 0.11). Subscale scores of Willingness to Sacrifice and Persistence showed significant variation in the strength of motivation across time with a medium effect size, p = 0.015, [Formula: see text] = 0.07 and p = 0.007, [Formula: see text] = 0.08, respectively. Examination performance varied significantly over time (p < 0.001), with a large effect size ([Formula: see text] = 0.16). However, no significant correlation was found between the SMMS-R and examination scores.

conclusionStudents often enter medical school with high levels of motivation, yet their strength of motivation may fluctuate as they encounter the realities and rigor of the curriculum. Results from our study revealed a significant decline in the strength of motivation and examination performance as medical students advanced in basic science and core clinical training. Our findings can inform the implementation of student-supporting mechanisms that could help sustain original (or higher) levels of strength of motivation as medical students advance in their training.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceMotivationStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical curriculumMotivationStrength of motivation for medical school-revised (SMMS-R)Student-centered curriculumSummative assessment

Identifiers

PMID40781667
PMCPMC12333129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.