Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781619›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Phase II single vs hypofractionated irradiation for timely access to partial breast radiotherapy (SHIFT-PB).

Robert Olson, Marjorie Cua, Quinn Matthews, Jordanna Laing, Dylan Narinesingh, Alan Nichol, Tanya Berrang, Theodora Koulis, Tania Karan, Nick Chng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06885671 (Phase II Single vs Hypofractionated Irradiation For Timely Access to Partial Breast Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06885671 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Single vs Hypofractionated Irradiation For Timely Access to Partial Breast Radiotherapy: SHIFT-PB

TypeinterventionalSponsorBritish Columbia Cancer AgencyRan2026 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)ArmsMultiple Fraction PBI, Single Fraction PBI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert OlsonUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. rolson2@bccancer.bc.ca.
Marjorie CuaBC Cancer-Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada.
Quinn MatthewsBC Cancer-Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada.
Jordanna LaingBC Cancer-Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada.
Dylan NarinesinghUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Alan NicholUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tanya BerrangUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Theodora KoulisUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tania KaranBC Cancer-Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nick ChngBC Cancer-Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada.

Funding

BC Cancer Foundation F23-05976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the leading cause of global cancer incidence. In early-stage disease, standard treatment with breast-conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI) is associated with excellent outcomes. Multiple studies with extensive follow-up periods have demonstrated the comparative efficacy and toxicity outcomes of partial breast irradiation (PBI) in contrast to WBI. Various dose fractionation schedules for PBI have been recommended in clinical practice guidelines. In British Columbia (BC), a dose of 26 Gy in 5 fractions has been adopted. Early studies on single-fraction (SF) radiation for PBI have investigated its safety and effect on cosmetic outcomes, with promising initial results. In the context of the ongoing health care crisis, single-fraction PBI has the potential to reduce wait times and improve access to radiation. This study will therefore investigate a single-fraction PBI dose of 13 Gy.

methodsThis is a phase II randomized controlled trial, with a primary objective of testing the feasibility of randomizing participants to 1 vs. 5 fractions of PBI for early stage, node negative, breast cancer. The primary endpoint is the ability to accrue 60 participants at 4 of the 6 BC Cancer centres over a 2- year period and to randomize them to 1 vs. 5 fractions of radiotherapy for PBI. Its secondary endpoints are time from CT simulation to partial breast radiotherapy, local control rates, quality of life as measured by Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI)-Breast, rates of provider-rated toxicities as measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), rates of participant-reported toxicities as measured by participant reported outcome version of CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE), overall survival, and progression-free survival. DISCUSSION: One of the trial's objectives is testing the feasibility of randomizing participants to single vs. multiple fractions for PBI. If successful, it will lead to a phase III non-inferiority trial with the potential to inform breast cancer treatment guidelines. Ultimately, if found to be non-inferior, a single-fraction PBI can reduce wait times, facilitate access to radiation, and improve patient convenience, particularly for those in rural and remote communities who must travel long distances to receive high-quality cancer care.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06885671. Date of Registration: 14 March 2025.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedQuality of LifeEarly-stage breast cancerPartial breast irradiationSingle fraction

Identifiers

PMID40781619
PMCPMC12333179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.