ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
CT-based radiomics model for noninvasive prediction of progression-free survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter study incorporating preoperative and postoperative clinical factors.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prognostic model based on ScissorTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Development of a computed tomography radiomics and CD38 integrated model: predicting immunotherapy response and investigating biological implications in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Noninvasive preoperative prediction of perineural invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Habitat radiomics based on CT for assessing BRCA mutation status in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the potential of combining radiomics with clinicoradiological features in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) after the surgery of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC).
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, a total of 195 patients with pathologically confirmed HGSOC who underwent cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy were included from two institutions (train cohort, n = 134; test cohort, n = 61). From the train cohort, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses systematically evaluated associations between clinicoradiological features and PFS, culminating in a clinical prediction model for stratifying progression risk. Radiomics features were extracted and utilized to build the radiomics model through univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression. A combined model integrating both clinicoradiological and radiomics features was subsequently developed. The concordance index (C-index) was used to assess the predictive performance of different models in 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS evens among HGSOC patients. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, with area under the curve (AUC) values calculated at various time points. as well as calibration curves and Brier scores to evaluate prediction accuracy and model reliability. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to evaluate the clinical utility of each model in predicting PFS.
resultsFive clinicoradiologicall features, including supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, CA125 level, HE4 level, residual tumor status, and FIGO stage, were included in the clinical model.The combined model achieved strong predictive performance with a C-index of 0.758 (95% CI: 0.685-0.830) in the train cohort and 0.707 (95% CI: 0.593-0.821) in the test cohort, outperforming both the clinical and radiomics models independently. The combined model demonstrated superior performance for 1-year prediction, with the highest accuracy (0.822), AUC (0.864), and lowest Brier score (0.132) in the train cohort, and the highest balanced accuracy (0.806), AUC (0.787), and lowest Brier score (0.159) in the test cohort. For 3-year survival, the radiomics model showed the best performance, with a balanced accuracy of 0.760, AUC of 0.838, and Brier score of 0.168 in train cohort, and a balanced accuracy of 0.813, AUC of 0.785, and Brier score of 0.198 in test cohort. Similarly, the radiomics model overall outperformed the other models for 5-year survival, with a balanced accuracy of 0.813, AUC of 0.887, and Brier score of 0.164 in train cohort, and a balanced accuracy of 0.813, AUC of 0.767, and Brier score of 0.207 in test cohort.
conclusionThe combined model excels in 1-year PFS prediction and overall risk stratification, while the radiomics model performs better for 3- and 5-year fixed-time PFS predictions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.