Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781606›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Increase in intimate partner violence during the COVID19 lockdown in uganda: a household survey.

Freddy Eric Kitutu, Ronald Olum, Sharon Kitibwakye Nakamanya, Olivia Nakisita, Sian E Clarke, Eleanor Hutchinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Freddy Eric KitutuDepartment of Pharmacy, Makerere University School of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. kitutufred@gmail.com.
Ronald OlumDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Sharon Kitibwakye NakamanyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Makerere University School of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Olivia NakisitaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Sian E ClarkeDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eleanor HutchinsonDepartment of Global Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

UKRI Medical Research Council Global Effort on COVID-19 (GECO) MR/V035592/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the novel COVID-19 pandemic, governments worldwide limited people's movements in what became known as lockdowns to contain the spread of infection. Uganda experienced one of Africa's strictest, longest, and most widespread lockdowns. In this paper, we examine how the novel COVID-19 pandemic and government response to address it impacted intimate partner violence (IPV) among men and women in two diverse districts in central Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A household survey was conducted in Luwero and Mukono districts among 1680 respondents from 84 villages from October 25th, 2021, to December 3rd, 2021. Data were collected using standardized structured questionnaires adapted from UN guidelines for producing statistics on violence in women. Outcome variables were lifetime and current (measured as incidents in the past 12 months) prevalence of IPV and whether there was reported increase during the COVID-19 lockdown, assessed by several items under emotional, socio-economic, physical and sexual violence and analyzed as individual items or derived composite variables.

resultsThe lifetime prevalence of IPV was 55.4%, higher among women compared to men (57.9% vs. 47.4%, p < 0.001). The current prevalence of IPV was 31.0% (497/1603), higher among women than men but the difference did not reach statistical significance (32.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.071). Of these, 73.0% (363/497) reported that the COVID-19 lockdown worsened their IPV experiences, which was higher among women than men (74.7% vs. 67.0%,) p = 0.113) but not statistically significant. At multivariable analysis, the reported increase in IPV during the COVID-19 lockdown was significantly lower in participants with at least a diploma education, in subsistence farming or self-employed. While emotional violence was the most prevalent across both genders, socioeconomic violence was reported to have increased most during the lockdown. Only 41.9% of those who experienced violence sought help, and the majority sought help from non-formal mechanisms like family members.

conclusionWhile IPV was more likely to be experienced by women than men, in almost all cases, those of both genders who had experienced IPV reported that it had gotten worse during the lockdowns. Pandemic preparedness and government responses during future pandemics must consider how lockdowns can create unintended negative consequences, including exacerbating IPV.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intimate Partner ViolenceQuarantineAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUgandaYoung AdultCentral UgandaCOVID19 pandemicEmotional violenceGenderIntimate partner violenceLockdownPhysical violenceResponseSexual violenceSocioeconomic violence

Identifiers

PMID40781606
PMCPMC12333253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.