Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781595›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

Comparison of continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block (cSAPB) with bupivacaine versus single liposomal bupivacaine block in postoperative analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS): a randomized controlled trial.

Mingyue Zhang, Zhuo Zheng, Xianfeng Xie, Yuee Dai, Maosen Zhao, Ke Gao, Shaoxing Liu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingyue Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China.
Zhuo Zheng *Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China.
Xianfeng XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China.
Yuee DaiDepartment of Pain Clinic, School of Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Maosen ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China.
Ke GaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China.
Shaoxing LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610000, China. liushaoxing2023@163.com.

Funding

Health Commission of Sichuan Province Medical Science and Technology Program 2022-217Sichuan Medical Association's Research in the fields of oncology, anesthesia Program (Hengrui) SC202402Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2022YFS0439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is a commonly used minimally invasive technique in thoracic surgery. The continuous serratus anterior plane block (cSAPB) involves the placement of a catheter deep in the serratus anterior fascia for the slow and continuous infusion of local anesthetics. Liposomal bupivacaine is a formulation of bupivacaine encapsulated in liposomes, which prolongs the release of the drug. This study compares the impact of cSAPB with bupivacaine and single-shot SAPB with liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative recovery quality and pain control after VATS.

methodsThis study is a Randomized Controlled Trial. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving cSAPB with conventional bupivacaine (cSAPB + CB) (n = 35) and the other receiving SAPB with liposomal bupivacaine (SAPB + LB) (n = 35). The primary outcome measure was the Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores at 24 and 48 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included: pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scale at rest and during deep breathing at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, postoperative pulmonary function, total opioid consumption during and after surgery, and adverse events.

resultsQoR-15 scores were significantly elevated in the SAPB + LB group at both 24 and 48 h post-surgery(24 h: p = 0.001; 48 h: p = 0.02). Comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the SAPB + CB group and the SAPB + LB group in terms of VAS scores for pain at rest at 24 and 48 h (24 h: p = 0.06; 48 h: p = 0.46), or during deep breathing (24 h: p = 0.45; 48 h: p = 0.73). Additionally, there were no significant differences in lung function tests (FEV1/FVC ratio, p = 0.95), total intraoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.76), or total postoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.69). However, the incidence of local complications such as swelling and pain was significantly reduced in the SAPB + LB group (p = 0.03).

conclusionsThe use of single liposomal bupivacaine serratus anterior plane block provides superior early postoperative recovery quality and reduces the incidence of local complications.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100054089, June 28,2024.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBupivacaineNerve BlockPostoperative PainThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomesContinuous serratus anterior plane blockLiposomal bupivacainePainVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40781595
PMCPMC12333079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.