ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing real-time IoT-based public safety alert and emergency response systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Piezoelectric Foams Enabling Noise Absorption and Deep-Learning-Driven Motion Recognition.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Low-Cost IoT-Based Computational System for Real-Time Biogas Monitoring in UASB Reactors Using NDIR Sensors and ESP32.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Survey on Reconnaissance Autonomous Robotic Systems for Disaster Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Secure Cross-Layer Mobile Sensing Framework for Real-Time Disaster Reporting and Visualisation Using a Mobile Application.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the design and evaluation of a real-time IoT-based emergency response and public safety alert system tailored for rapid detection, classification, and dissemination of alerts during critical incidents. The proposed architecture combines a distributed network of heterogeneous sensors (e.g., gas, flame, vibration, and biometric), edge computing nodes (Raspberry Pi, ESP32), and cloud platforms (AWS IoT, Firebase) to ensure low-latency and high-availability operations. Communication is facilitated using secure MQTT over TLS, with fallback to LoRa for rural or low-connectivity environments. A prototype was implemented and tested across four emergency scenarios fire, traffic accident, gas leak, and medical distress within a smart city simulation testbed. The system achieved such as consistent alert latency under 450 ms, detection accuracy exceeding 95%, and scalability supporting over 12,000 concurrent devices. A comprehensive comparison against seven state-of-the-art systems confirmed superior performance in latency, reliability (99.1% alert success), and uptime (99.8%). These results underscore the system's potential for deployment in urban, industrial, and infrastructure-vulnerable environments, with future work aimed at incorporating AI-driven prediction and federated learning for cloudless operation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.