ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Fertility Information Perceptions and Needs of People with Cancer, Their Family Members, and Caregivers.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whole ovary cryopreservation and transplantation: a narrative review of technological advances, biological hurdles, and clinical translation in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertility loss affects up to 80% of cancer survivors, yet many do not have access to information about fertility risks and preservation options. While studies have noted the need for more fertility information and support for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, no study has comprehensively assessed their fertility-related informational needs. We evaluated how AYAs and their family or caregivers perceived their fertility conversations with healthcare professionals, and assessed their need for medical, practical, physical, social, psychological, and spiritual information. An online, bilingual, cross-sectional survey was distributed via social media, targeting AYAs with cancer and their family or caregivers. Importance scores were calculated for each knowledge domain to assess what type of information was most important to participants. The relationship between participant characteristics and importance scores was evaluated using multiple regression. Different methods of information delivery were ranked according to participants' preferences within each domain. Most participants (59%) reported having "rarely/never" been spoken to about fertility by their healthcare providers. Participants assigned high importance to fertility information in the medical, practical, physical, and psychological domains, with younger participants assigning higher importance to medical and practical information. Across most domains, participants preferred to receive information through one-on-one teaching with a healthcare provider or via pamphlets. Together, our results show that fertility remains underdiscussed in cancer care, and that AYAs with cancer and their caregivers need more information and psychological support. These findings will inform the development of tailored resources for healthcare professionals and people with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40781496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.