Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781466›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CTAB modified SnO

Poundoss Chellamuthu, Kirubaveni Savarimuthu, M Gulam Nabi Alsath, R Krishnamoorthy, Yuvaraj T, Feras Alnaimat, Mohammad Shabaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Poundoss ChellamuthuCentre for Smart Energy Systems, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, India.
Kirubaveni SavarimuthuDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600025, India.
M Gulam Nabi AlsathDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600025, India.
R KrishnamoorthyCentre for Advanced Wireless Integrated Technology, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, India.
Yuvaraj TCentre for Smart Energy Systems, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, India.
Feras AlnaimatFaculty of Engineering, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad ShabazMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India. bhatsab4@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the development of a high-performance resistive humidity sensor based on a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-assisted tin oxide (SnO₂) nanostructured thin film integrated with a Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS)/SnO₂ heterojunction. The sensor design incorporates CTAB at varying weight percentages (0%, 6%, 11%, 16%, and 20%) during the hydrothermal synthesis of SnO₂ to regulate crystal growth, morphology, and surface area. The sample with 20 wt% CTAB (SnO-5) exhibited a flower-like stacked nanostructure, confirmed via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), which significantly enhanced water molecule adsorption and charge transport pathways. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed the tetragonal rutile phase of SnO₂ with decreasing crystallite size from 12.2 nm (nm) to 4.8 nm as CTAB concentration increased. The incorporation of PEDOT: PSS, a p-type conducting polymer, onto the SnO₂ layer via spin coating formed a p-n heterojunction, which improved charge separation and reduced recombination, thereby enhancing electrical conductivity and sensor performance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and current-voltage (J-V) measurements demonstrated that SnO-5 exhibited a low internal resistance (1.1 kilo ohms (kΩ)), a minimal cut-in voltage (0.071 Volts (V)), and a high current response (2.645 micro Amps.(µA)), indicating efficient carrier transport. The optimized SnO-5 sensor achieved a high sensitivity of 85.7%, a rapid response time of 14 s (s), and a quick recovery time of 7 s, with low hysteresis (1.60%) across a broad humidity range (5-97% Relative Humidity (RH)), outperforming several existing humidity sensing platforms. The synergistic effects of CTAB-induced nanostructuring and heterojunction engineering played a pivotal role in improving moisture interaction, charge mobility, and structural stability. Furthermore, to validate real-time application feasibility, machine learning (ML) algorithms were implemented to model and predict sensor behavior. Among the tested models, Random Forest (RF) Regression achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.99), confirming the sensor's robustness and reproducibility in dynamic environments. The proposed sensor's outstanding performance, in combination with ML-enhanced evaluation, positions it as a promising candidate for next-generation humidity monitoring systems in industrial, environmental, and biomedical applications, including respiratory diagnostics and non-invasive health monitoring.

Indexed as

CTAB-assisted SnO2 nanostructuresFlower-like morphologyHydrothermal synthesisMachine learning-based sensor evaluationPEDOT:PSS heterojunctionResistive humidity sensingResponse and recovery timeSensitivity and hysteresis analysis

Identifiers

PMID40781466
PMCPMC12334569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.