ArticleScientific reports2025
AAGP integrates physicochemical and compositional features for machine learning-based prediction of anti-aging peptides.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging is a natural phenomenon characterized by the loss of normal morphology and physiological functioning of the body, causing wrinkles on the skin, loss of hair, and compromised immune systems. Peptide therapies have emerged as a promising approach in aging studies because of their excellent tolerability, low immunogenicity, and high specificity. Computational methods can significantly expedite wet lab-based anti-aging peptide discovery by predicting potential candidates with high specificity and efficacy. We propose AAGP, an anti-aging peptide predictor based on diverse physicochemical and compositional features. Two datasets were constructed, both shared anti-aging peptides as positives, with the first using antimicrobial peptides as negatives and the second using random peptides as negatives. Peptides were encoded using 4,305 features, followed by adaptive feature selection with a heuristic algorithm on both datasets. Nine machine learning models were used for cross-validation and independent tests. AAGP achieves reasonably accurate prediction performance, with MCCs of 0.692 and 0.580 and AUCs of 0.963 and 0.808 on the two independent test datasets, respectively. Our feature importance analysis shows that physicochemical features are more crucial for the first dataset, whereas compositional features hold greater importance for the second. The source code of AAGP is available at https://github.com/saptawtf/AAGP .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.